On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, RTE wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:26:26 +0300, Alan Stern wrote: > > Okay, here's a version of the patch for 2.6.23 and without the > > debugging information. > > Many thanks to you for the help! :) > In 2.6.23 patch works perfectly. Errors are not present. > > > My guess is that if you decrease max_sectors to 184 (to make it a > > multiple of 8) then the device will work without errors, even when the > > patch isn't present. > > Yes, you are right. > max_sectors<=184 is safe for my device even without the patch. > With the patch errors are not present at any max_sectors.
Okay, I'll submit the patch. You might also want to test this patch. It should automatically set max_sectors to 64 -- that's lower than you need but it should work without errors. (The patch is against 2.6.24-rc3, so you may have to merge it by hand into the source for an earlier kernel.) Alan Stern Index: usb-2.6/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h =================================================================== --- usb-2.6.orig/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h +++ usb-2.6/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h @@ -731,6 +731,13 @@ UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0584, 0x0008, 0x0102, 0x US_SC_SCSI, US_PR_ALAUDA, init_alauda, 0 ), #endif +/* Reported by RTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> */ +UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x058f, 0x6387, 0x0141, 0x0141, + "JetFlash", + "TS1GJF2A/120", + US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, + US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ), + /* Fabrizio Fellini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> */ UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0595, 0x4343, 0x0000, 0x2210, "Fujifilm", ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users