On 17 May 2010 13:03, Steve Holdoway <st...@greengecko.co.nz> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:47 +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > On 17 May 2010 12:32, Solor Vox <solor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Are you going to have a tux on the table? =) > > > > He and I have had a wee conversation. > > > > Initially. he stated that he is feeling very shy and frightened of > > being exposed to public view, yet again, in a alcolhol fuelled > > environment. > > > > I told him to stop be so darned silly. > > > > He has therefore, very reluctantly, agreed to do his duty as a mascot. > > > > So, Yes, Tux will be on view - initially anyway, but I have > > compromised with him, and he will be allowed to retire to my pocket as > > the evening progresses. > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely etc. > > Christopher Sawtell > > That's pretty wimpy behaviour from an ex IBM stress-Tux... >
Yes, yes, I know. All I know is that his psychiatric health was in a dreadful state when he came into my care. The most serious case of computer induced PTSD I have ever encountered. Goodness only knows what happened to the poor little sod during his stint with IBM. Been abused as some sort of stress-relief punch-bag as far as I have been able to determine. A sad case, but I am glad to be able report that after sitting peacefully on my mantleshelf in a pure Linux environment for a number of months he is now well on the way to a full recovery. -- Sincerely etc. Christopher Sawtell