On Thursday 06 December 2007, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> > An interesting question still is how close the native celleb machine
> > definition is to the one from platforms/cell/setup.c. Maybe it's best
> > to have a common machine definition for these two in the end.
>
> You know celleb-native is between celleb-beat and cell blade. I also
> think it's best if we can use a common machine definition and a common
> setup code. But there are many differences mainly caused by their
> firmwares, and this disturbs the integration. I think celleb-native is
> closer to celleb-beat than to cell blade. So I put celleb-native code
> in platforms/celleb.
Ok, fine with me then. Thanks,
Arnd <><
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
