On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > >>> The PowerPC side isn't without fault too. PowerPC still doesn't have a >>> good way to load the fabric/machine driver. >> >> I'm finding it difficult to square these two statements - from an ASoC >> point of view the main thing this patch is doing is adding a machine >> driver and that's not something that's going to go away. > > Jon's concern is that there is no straightforward way to build a kernel with > multiple fabric drivers and have the right one chosen via the device tree. > This > is just a limitation of the device tree model, and no one has come up with a > good solution yet. > > The problem still exists in ASoC V2. However, it's not anything that ASoC > itself needs to be concerned with. It's purely a PowerPC problem.
It's purely an *OF Device Tree* problem. PowerPC isn't the only platform using the device tree. :-) g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
