On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 14:51 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Mikey, > > On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:33:56 +1100 Michael Neuling <mi...@neuling.org> wrote: > > > > Surely we only need SPARSE_IRQ now and not MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ. > > > > In fact, keeping MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ seems to make SPARSE_IRQ user > > selectable, which we don't want anymore since ad5b7f1350c2. > > Yes, indeed. I will fix up the merge resolution for tomorrow.
This is my fault. Grant's patch had a collision and I manually fixed it up. While doing that, I put back MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ which the patch originally took out. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
