Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.w...@huawei.com> writes:
> The access_[pkey]_error() of vma already checked under per-VMA lock, if
> it is a bad access, directly handle error, no need to retry with mmap_lock
> again. In order to release the correct lock, pass the mm_struct into
> bad_access_pkey()/bad_access(), if mm is NULL, release vma lock, or
> release mmap_lock. Since the page faut is handled under per-VMA lock,
> count it as a vma lock event with VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.w...@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
I thought there might be a nicer way to do this, plumbing the mm and vma
down through all those levels is a bit of a pain (vma->vm_mm exists
after all).
But I couldn't come up with anything obviously better, without doing
lots of refactoring first, which would be a pain to integrate into this
series.
So anyway, if the series goes ahead:
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
cheers
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> index 53335ae21a40..215690452495 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> @@ -71,23 +71,26 @@ static noinline int bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs
> *regs, unsigned long add
> return __bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, address, SEGV_MAPERR);
> }
>
> -static int __bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address, int
> si_code)
> +static int __bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address, int
> si_code,
> + struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> - struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
>
> /*
> * Something tried to access memory that isn't in our memory map..
> * Fix it, but check if it's kernel or user first..
> */
> - mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> + if (mm)
> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> + else
> + vma_end_read(vma);
>
> return __bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, address, si_code);
> }
>
> static noinline int bad_access_pkey(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long
> address,
> + struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> - struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> int pkey;
>
> /*
> @@ -109,7 +112,10 @@ static noinline int bad_access_pkey(struct pt_regs
> *regs, unsigned long address,
> */
> pkey = vma_pkey(vma);
>
> - mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> + if (mm)
> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> + else
> + vma_end_read(vma);
>
> /*
> * If we are in kernel mode, bail out with a SEGV, this will
> @@ -124,9 +130,10 @@ static noinline int bad_access_pkey(struct pt_regs
> *regs, unsigned long address,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static noinline int bad_access(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
> +static noinline int bad_access(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
> + struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> - return __bad_area(regs, address, SEGV_ACCERR);
> + return __bad_area(regs, address, SEGV_ACCERR, mm, vma);
> }
>
> static int do_sigbus(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
> @@ -479,13 +486,13 @@ static int ___do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
> unsigned long address,
>
> if (unlikely(access_pkey_error(is_write, is_exec,
> (error_code & DSISR_KEYFAULT), vma))) {
> - vma_end_read(vma);
> - goto lock_mmap;
> + count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS);
> + return bad_access_pkey(regs, address, NULL, vma);
> }
>
> if (unlikely(access_error(is_write, is_exec, vma))) {
> - vma_end_read(vma);
> - goto lock_mmap;
> + count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS);
> + return bad_access(regs, address, NULL, vma);
> }
>
> fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags | FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK,
> regs);
> @@ -521,10 +528,10 @@ static int ___do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
> unsigned long address,
>
> if (unlikely(access_pkey_error(is_write, is_exec,
> (error_code & DSISR_KEYFAULT), vma)))
> - return bad_access_pkey(regs, address, vma);
> + return bad_access_pkey(regs, address, mm, vma);
>
> if (unlikely(access_error(is_write, is_exec, vma)))
> - return bad_access(regs, address);
> + return bad_access(regs, address, mm, vma);
>
> /*
> * If for any reason at all we couldn't handle the fault,
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-ri...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
