Eugene Surovegin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:34:59AM -0800, Jeff Mock wrote: >> # ./ethtool -S eth0 >> NIC statistics: >> rx_packets: 683430611 >> rx_bytes: 45405076316 >> tx_packets: 1331225622 >> tx_bytes: 2005276384145 >> rx_packets_csum: 683428670 >> tx_packets_csum: 1331224150 >> tx_undo: 0 >> rx_dropped_stack: 80 >> rx_dropped_oom: 0 >> rx_dropped_error: 0 >> [lots more 0's...] >> >> The number of checksum errors seems okay and doesn't really change when >> I plug in the second network connection, but the ring buffer usage still >> increases dramatically. > > Stats look OK. BTW, tx/rx_packets_csum is not a number of checksum > errors, that's a number of packets where driver used hw checksum > acceleration :). >
Ah, silly me. Can you tell me where I can find the number of received packets with bad ethernet checksums? I'm still thinking that I might have a little hardware problem that is increasing the bit error rate when I use both ports, ultimately increasing my buffer utilization. thanks, jeff _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
