>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 18:36:38 -0500 (EST)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from ["vinton g.
cerf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
>>From MCI.NET!vcerf Sun Feb 7 18:36:34 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from NOD.RESTON.MCI.NET(nod.Reston.mci.net[166.45.6.38]) (2748
bytes) by ns1.vrx.net
> via sendmail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
> (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 18:36:34 -0500 (EST)
> (Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2 built 1997-Dec-18)
>Received: from vcerf.reston.mci.net ([166.45.18.99])
> by shoe.reston.mci.net (PMDF V5.2-29 #33823)
> with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun,
> 7 Feb 1999 18:36:25 EST
>Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 18:36:07 -0500
>From: "vinton g. cerf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: ISOC support for CORE/INTA Domain Name Support Organization:
> Principles or Expediency?
>In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.2
>Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>
>michael, i don't believe the proposal does what you claim it does.
>
>vint
>
>At 05:36 PM 2/7/99 -0500, Michael Sondow wrote:
>>In your opinion, is it in keeping with ISOC's guiding principle of assuring
>>"the beneficial, open evolution of the global Internet" to create a Domain
>>Name Support Organization of ICANN that gives control of the domain space to
>>the trademarks lobby and the big businesses they represent? If not, why do
>>you permit ISOC's name to be used in support of the CORE/INTA DNSO
>>application?
>>
>> Michael Sondow
>>
>>============================================================
>> Concerns about rights and ownership of domains are
>> inappropriate. It is appropriate to be concerned
>> about responsibilities and service to the community.
>> --- Jon Postel, 1994.
>>============================================================
>>International Congress of Independent Internet Users (ICIIU)
>> http://www.iciiu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>============================================================
>>
>=================================================================
>
>See you at INET'99, San Jose, CA, June 22-25,1999
>http://www.isoc.org/inet99/
>
>
>
--
The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's all just marketing" +1 (613) 473-1719
Maitland House, Bannockburn, Ontario, CANADA, K0K 1Y0
