>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 21:34:59 -0500 (EST)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [Pisanty
Baruch Alejandro-FQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
>>From servidor.unam.mx!apisan Wed Feb 10 21:34:58 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from servidor.unam.mx([132.248.10.5]) (1308 bytes) by ns1.vrx.net
> via sendmail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
> (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Feb 1999 21:34:57 -0500 (EST)
> (Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2 built 1997-Dec-18)
>Received: from localhost (apisan@localhost)
> by servidor.unam.mx (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA19188;
> Wed, 10 Feb 1999 20:32:37 -0600 (CST)
>Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 20:32:36 -0600 (CST)
>From: Pisanty Baruch Alejandro-FQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc: jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ICANN's Defective Competition Guidelines, etc (was Accredita
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
>Hello,
>
>is this statement,
>
>On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
>
>> OK, how about this. I have come into information about you, information that
>> others could use to verify the veracity of your identity and claims.
>>
>
>something we all *really* need? Whteher it be legitimate (whence it should
>be private), or provoking, or a plumage display, or the blackmailish
>rhetoric it reeks of - could you keep it private till you find out
>something we have to know?
>
>Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
--
The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's all just marketing" +1 (613) 473-1719
Maitland House, Bannockburn, Ontario, CANADA, K0K 1Y0
