>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:38:11 -0500 (EST)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>>From pop.interport.net!martys Sun Feb 14 00:38:10 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from astor.interport.net([199.184.165.18]) (906 bytes) by ns1.vrx.net
> via sendmail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
> (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:38:10 -0500 (EST)
> (Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2 built 1997-Dec-18)
>Received: from [207.38.249.14] (ts3port14.port.net [207.38.249.14])
> by astor.interport.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA01299
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:38:55 -0500 (EST)
>Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:38:55 -0500 (EST)
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Message-Id: <v015305023c9085911fcf@[207.38.249.14]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS
>
>
>>Some time long, long ago, the drafters of IP treaties reognized that
>>copyrights, patents, and trademarks were different types of intellectual
>>property. Now we have yet another type of IP beast--domain names.
>>
>>So can we please stop trying to force this square peg into a round hole?
>
>
>hold that thought.
>
>
>
--
The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's all just marketing" +1 (613) 473-1719
Maitland House, Bannockburn, Ontario, CANADA, K0K 1Y0
