[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [llvm] [mlir] Split the llvm::ThreadPool into an abstract base class and an implementation (PR #82094)

[Mehdi Amini via lldb-commits]

================
@@ -227,7 +265,7 @@ class ThreadPool {
 class ThreadPoolTaskGroup {
----------------
joker-eph wrote:

 > What you get is probably a cleaner API IMHO
 
 I don't quite get why it would cleaner actually? This makes is for a weaker 
interface that does not guarantee any uniqueness and you lose type safety as 
well.
 I must missing your point here.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82094
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits