It is not true that we don't maintain 1.2 any longer. If important issues are found we may still address them even though we are focused on Log4j2. On Apr 28, 2014 4:01 PM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We don't maintain 1.2.x anymore. Also, I think you're supposed to use ant > to build 1.2. > > Please check out Log4j 2.0, though, as we're preparing to release that and > would like feedback. > > > On 28 April 2014 14:30, <walter_mar...@dellteam.com> wrote: > > > Dell - Internal Use - Confidential > > > > > > 1) The pom file has to be updated to allow for maven-site-plugin 3.3 > > rather than 3.1 > > > > 2) The mvm staging step gives a null pointer exception > > > > Apache.log4j-1.2.17 > > > > Thanks > > > > Walter > > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >
