Now I'm not buying into the argument on either side, but it does remind me of a lovely quote by Australian programming legend Alan Kennington: Eiffel is some sort of avant-garde French computing movement which believes that programming is reactionary and oppressive. Instead, they see the future of computing as lying in broad strokes of the mouse to communicate the software developer's creative desires. The Eiffel system then writes a program for the computing artist. As is typical of French ideas, Eiffel appeals to those sections of the middle class eho can't remember what work was like, and don't particularly want to be reminded. ;-) Damian
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Mark Fowler
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Greg McCarroll
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Piers Cawley
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] David Cantrell
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis ... David Cantrell
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exege... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exege... Robin Szemeti
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's ... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis ... Chris Devers
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Damian Conway
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Philip Newton
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Paul Makepeace