On 22/02/2017 09:57 πμ, Johan Kragsterman wrote: > > Also, you can consider Alkis suggestion to use ltsp-pnp. > With that you got some good simplicity enhancements, but a trade off is less flexibility. > You can not use different images for different needs and architectures, all clients need > to use the same. In my setups I have preferred to use normal ltsp, but for sure, with a > less complicated environment ltsp-pnp would be useful. Though for me, I prefer the > flexibility of having the choice of different chroots. >
ltsp-pnp uses the server / as a template for the default "chroot". It doesn't prohibit you from creating 10 more chroots if you want to. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
