Erik Hatcher wrote:

On Mar 30, 2004, at 5:59 PM, Kevin A. Burton wrote:

Seems to only make sense to allow a caller to find the searchables a MultiSearcher was created with:


Could you elaborate on why it makes sense? What if the caller changed a Searchable in the array? Would anything bad happen? (I don't know, haven't looked at the code).

Yes... something bad could happen... but that would be amazingly stupid ... we should probably recommend that it be readonly.

Kevin

--

Please reply using PGP.

http://peerfear.org/pubkey.asc NewsMonster - http://www.newsmonster.org/
Kevin A. Burton, Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965
AIM/YIM - sfburtonator, Web - http://peerfear.org/
GPG fingerprint: 5FB2 F3E2 760E 70A8 6174 D393 E84D 8D04 99F1 4412
IRC - freenode.net #infoanarchy | #p2p-hackers | #newsmonster

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to