You are mistaken if you think this applies generally MH --- On Sat, 2/7/11, Christopher Wilke <chriswi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Christopher Wilke <chriswi...@yahoo.com> Subject: [LUTE] Re: What's the point to 'historical sound' To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu, "Ron Andrico" <praelu...@hotmail.com>, "Martyn Hodgson" <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> Date: Saturday, 2 July, 2011, 19:29 Martyn, --- On Sat, 7/2/11, Martyn Hodgson <[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > The whole effort of historical musicology > for at least the past 50 > years has been to determine, in so far as > the evidence exists and to > the best of our ability, what the earlier > composers (and thus their > audiences) would have expected. > Really? I gathered that the whole point of historical musicology involves adopting some all-embracing modern social thesis (usually inherited from one's doctoral advisor and of a properly radical persuasion) and then diligently applying oneself to creating a decontextualized selective historiography demonstrating how all of the "great ones" were secretly ardent adherents of the then-heretical philosophy. I'm thinking of something like Susan McClary's hypothesis that Schubert's instrumental music is really a thinly veiled homosexual manifesto because he often used "girly" chords related by thirds. Chris To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html