I remember playing through the book the first time. So difficult! But
strangely familiar. And no open strings ... only then I realised.
David
*******************************
David van Ooijen
[1]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
[2]www.davidvanooijen.nl
*******************************
On 23 February 2017 at 09:31, Matthew Daillie
<[3]dail...@club-internet.fr> wrote:
Hi Dan,
I shall send you a list of concordances of the Libro Secondo. You
are in luck, all of the pieces appear in Ness.
The facsimile and its notorious Neapolitan tablature would demand an
enormous amount of retraining of the brain to play from directly (at
least for someone with an indolent brain like mine) as everything is
offset by one digit.
Best,
Matthew
> On Feb 23, 2017, at 7:51, Dan Winheld <[4]dwinh...@lmi.net> wrote:
>
> Thank you all- no luck on this; (nothing on the LSA website, just the
better known sources) I would love the Minkoff but I imagine that it is
only slightly less unobtainable than a surviving copy of the original.
Basically, I would be good just knowing which- if any- of the pieces
are concordant with any of the ones in the Ness anthology, a first
edition copy that I have been wearing out for over 46 years now.
>
> Thanks to Stephan Olbertz, your edition looks very interesting,, we
may be in touch.
>
>
>> On 2/22/2017 6:53 PM, [5]lutesm...@me.com wrote:
>> You might try the lsa facsimile page. I think I saw it there.
>> Sean
>
>
>
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> [6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
References
1. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
2. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
3. mailto:dail...@club-internet.fr
4. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
5. mailto:lutesm...@me.com
6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
