On 19.05.2019 18:26, Matthew Daillie wrote:
Hi Rainer,
Diana Poulton's commentary remains unchanged in the 1981 edition.
I find your conclusion quite convincing but why then remove the diminished bar
(31) rather than the repeat of bar 15 (bar 32)?
I have no argument at all - just a matter of taste :)
In an edition I would offer both versions as I have done in a similar case in
my Holborne edition.
By the way, there was some discussion about a 4th edition to be published by Faber
& Faber 15 years ago.
Apparently there is no market for such editions, any more :(
The candidates for a non-profit publication (John, Stewart, Martin, Ian,
myself, ...) are probably too old and/or sick or dead :(
Rainer
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
