On 01/30/2012 03:29 AM, MaoXiaoyun wrote: > Hi: > > Recently we are planning to set up a cluster by using LXC. But one > problem we facing is > it would be to much MAC address. > > Here is the detail. We plan 1000 lXC in one physical linux server, so > there will be 1000 MAC > address, suppose we have 100 servers, so total will have 1000 * 100 MAC > address, far over the > capbility of our switch(Currently our network is big second layer, all MAC > addresses are recoreded > in core switch). > > If one server's all container share the same MAC address, but different IP > address, much like > "linux ip alias". There will be only 100 MAC existed. > > So my question is : is it possilbe to have LXC work with ip alias device?
Unfortunately, it is not supported by the kernel and was a big discussion when the network namespace was implemented. Finally the decision was to act the layer 2 for the virtualization. Maybe, the macvlan virtual network driver could be enhanced to accept the same mac address as the link if the macvlan port belongs to another network namespace and then forwards the packets to all the macvlan ports like multicasting. > Or any other suggestiones to solve the problem above. Yes, may be you can use the host as a gateway for the containers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
