On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:34 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting C Anthony Risinger (anth...@xtfx.me): > > there it would seem. however, while i could *maybe* see the rootfs > > being an unconditional slave, i would NOT want to see any lxc > > default/enforcement preventing container -> host propagation on a > > globally recursive scale. im of the opinion that the implementor > > should decide the best tactic ... especially in light of the fact the > > one distro may not even have the same problems as say > > ubutnu/fedora/etc because they keep mount points private by default.
> Good point. (I don't see it on ubuntu either fwiw) Perhaps there > should be a toggle in the per-container config file? Wait a minute. So you can't reproduce this problem on Ubuntu? Or am I misunderstanding that parenthetical. That would imply it's something wrt the Fedora basic setup of the host file systems, wouldn't it? Regards, Mike -- Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/
_______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
