Ah, nice one!
Thanks Stéphane. :-)

Jean-François
Le 16/06/2013 21:24, Stéphane GAUTIER a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> No udev is not useful in containers. The problem is that they are
> installed by dependencies.
> To enable the standard installation without udev installed, we use "Fake
> Packages" with version numbers = 100 as they moved to the place of real
> packets and without disrupting the operation.
>
> http://mercurial.giprecia.fr/escolan-fakepackages/
> http://main.unstable.debs.esco-lan.org/lucid/fake-udev_99.99.0 ~
> hg2_all.deb
> http://main.unstable.debs.esco-lan.org/lucid/fake-makedev_99.99.0 ~
> hg4_all.deb
> http://main.unstable.debs.esco-lan.org/lucid/fake-sysutils_99.99.0 ~
> hg2_all.deb
>
> Just make a package with the same name as the one you want to replace with
> a 100 number.
>
> Stéphane GAUTIER.
>
>
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:36:54 +0200, Jean-François Leroux
> <leroux.jeanfranc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I see that udevd and upstart-udev-bridge are runnning inside my
> containers.
>> Is this necessary ? And why (a short explanation would do) :-)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> PS : ubuntu containers on Ubuntu-server 12.04 LTS


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users

Reply via email to