"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > Should we be on it?
> |
> | *shrug* ... spread the word I'd say.
>
> The bad thing about _not_ beeing there is that a lot of new users that
> has never heard of TeX,LaTeX,LyX... will never discover us.
>
> Lgb
Yes. And about the criteria: I would give Lyx a fairly good vote for the
most of their criteria, so I see no problem with this. So although Lyx
isn´t a wordprocessor, it was the thing I was happy to find recently
when I thought I was searching a wordprocessor. :-)
Timm
