Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:05:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
This seems good indeed. In the long run, however, we should think of a way
to enforce this so we don't have to check manually (even some assert at
run time would be nice). Moreover, I don't see what do we gain by using a
lyxfunc internally, probably we should just put the content of the
corresponding dipatch code (that just inserts an inset!) in a standalone
function and call that instead.
Last time I proposed exactly that with the very same analysis, I was
told I didn't know what I was talking about ;-)
Was that me?
More like a combination of JMarc, maybe Lars and someone else that I do
not remember... You were more or less on my side IIRC.
Abdel.
