On Monday 01 February 2010 04:06:17 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: > > > On Friday 29 January 2010 18:41:57 Peter Kümmel wrote: > > >> Am Freitag, den 29.01.2010, 17:55 -0500 schrieb Steve Litt: > > > > > > This example has no content. I'd be interested to see a real LuaTeX > > > document in its native format. > > > > AFAIK LuaTeX is an engine (TeX to PDF converter) just like pdftex. It is > > fully backwards compatible, so all your documents should "just work" > > (at least if they work with pdftex). > > > > The lua interpreter is an addition. While lua scripts might look "worse" > > than your usual input file, the code can be much cleaner than many of > > the traditional packages and classes written in (La)TeX. > > Exactly. As a user, you usually do not use or see any lua code when using > lua(la)tex. You just write LaTeX2e (or ConTeXt or LaTeX3). > > Jürgen >
OK, I guess my question is this: If LyX were using LuaTex, what would my LyX document look like in Vim? SteveT Steve Litt Recession Relief Package http://www.recession-relief.US Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt
