Am 20.07.2010 um 00:25 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Peter Kümmel wrote: >>> Because we wait for svnadmin access anyway (with all the possibilities), >>> I've tested the svn copy way of restoring trunk? Maybe it is good >>> enough. >> >> hmm svn blame works. git-svn seems to be somewhat confused for the commits >> between last update and this commit (as they never existed). >> i will try whether this couldn't be fixed somehow... > > from what i could see all svn functions work normally.
Same here. Fine! > so my proposal would be that if anybody during tuesday find some svn problem > we normally continue within the current tree. > > objections? I don't have any. I have to say that I'm impressed by SVNs robustness. Stephan
