Am 29.01.2011 um 19:12 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 05:52:08PM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > >> Il 29/01/2011 17:13, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto: >>> >>>> I can also share my template-based one, that avoids code replication >>>> and actually turns this burden over the odocstream class itself. >>>> Assuming >>>> the latter works fine on all architectures, this one should as well :-). >>> >>> Forgot to attach. >> >> just don't even try it: my own brand new automated tests just started >> to fail because, with that template-ish thing, at the first attempt of >> typing a character in text-mode LyX was asserting :-). >> >> I'm using the Enrico's patch that works fine (at least on my 64-bit >> machine). > > Yet, I think your idea is right for avoiding code duplication. Let's see > whether requiring explicit instantiations works. If yes, adding a > forgotten type would only require adding a single-line instantiation > declaration. > > So, does the attach patch work for you?
This patch works here too (32 bit on Mac). Stephan
