On 09/24/2012 02:44 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Montag, 24. September 2012 um 14:10:33, schrieb Richard Heck
<rgh...@lyx.org>
> On 09/24/2012 01:07 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> -bool Messages::available() const
> >> +bool Messages::available(string const & c)
> >> {
> >> + (void)c;
> >> return false;
> >> }
> > Why this (void)c; construct?
> >
> Crushes an "unused variable" warning.
>
> rh
Why not
bool Messages::available(string const & ) { ... }
Yes, you could also do it that way. He probably wanted to keep the
signature the same as in the "real" routine.
rh
