Op 27-5-2013 21:40, Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
Op 27-5-2013 21:13, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
Am 27.05.2013 20:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
Scott, please don't mark bugs as easyfix if they are apparently
not that
easy to fix. If this bug would be easy to fix, somebody would
have done
this in the last 2 years, but nothing happened.
I do not agree with the logic of "easy bug" -> "quick fix". There are
two other plausible "easy bugs" in my opinion. Easy bugs that are
labor-intensive
Hmm, this sounds illogical to me. If a bug requires much work, it is
obviously not easy.
(Work is by definition not easy ;-) )
> and easy bugs that developers for whichever reason
don't want to fix. Both of these bug categories might be good places
for a newcommer to start.
OK, if that is the new meaning of easyfix, fine with me.
I agree that even if a bug requires much work, it can be an easyfix.
On the other hand, I'm not sure whether marking bugs as 'easyfix' will
really help.
Vincent
But please be sure that you know when something is easy to fix or not
;).. (see bug #8664).
Vincent
