On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:52:55PM +0200, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > The code does look fragile to me. I do not think that asking that > developers care about maintainability is being overzealous. Then, maybe > I am mistaken about the code and you got to something found maintainable > enough after thinking about it a lot, such that you did not feel the > need asking for advice. In that case, maybe all the misunderstandings > comes indeed from a different appreciation of what effort is asked. > > But to know this we would need to speak about the code. Every time I > want to discuss your commits, I know that you are going to take things > personally, to the point that sometimes I just prefer to let it off > before even asking. I do not know another LyX developer who reacts like > you do.
It's not what you say but how you say it. > Before arguing that I am not the official maintainer, ask yourself who > was the only one who tested several of your big changes and spent a lot > of time writing detailed testcases (lots of them!)? And where would LyX > be if I had not? I think you have an enormous ego and presumptuous manners. I have nothing more to add to this discussion. Good bye. -- Enrico
