On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:52:55PM +0200, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> 
> The code does look fragile to me. I do not think that asking that
> developers care about maintainability is being overzealous. Then, maybe
> I am mistaken about the code and you got to something found maintainable
> enough after thinking about it a lot, such that you did not feel the
> need asking for advice. In that case, maybe all the misunderstandings
> comes indeed from a different appreciation of what effort is asked.
> 
> But to know this we would need to speak about the code. Every time I
> want to discuss your commits, I know that you are going to take things
> personally, to the point that sometimes I just prefer to let it off
> before even asking. I do not know another LyX developer who reacts like
> you do.

It's not what you say but how you say it.

> Before arguing that I am not the official maintainer, ask yourself who
> was the only one who tested several of your big changes and spent a lot
> of time writing detailed testcases (lots of them!)? And where would LyX
> be if I had not?

I think you have an enormous ego and presumptuous manners.
I have nothing more to add to this discussion. Good bye.

-- 
Enrico

Reply via email to