Le 15/02/2017 à 02:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 05:20:19PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2017, 16:16 +0100 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
diff --git a/lib/layouts/acmsiggraph-0-92.layout
b/lib/layouts/acmsiggraph-0-92.layout
index 5732ecc..30a35df 100644
--- a/lib/layouts/acmsiggraph-0-92.layout
+++ b/lib/layouts/acmsiggraph-0-92.layout
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ End

  Style "Copyright_year"
         CopyStyle               "TOG online ID"
-       LatexName               copyrightyear
+       LatexName               CopyrightYear
         LabelString             "Year of copyright:"

Are you sure this command was not valid in previous versions? The
changelog of 0.93 says: "Corrected \CopyrightYear command". Perhaps you
should double-check with version 0.92.

+1

For more information on how to handle this situation, see the
Development manual section:
3.3 Layouts for document classes with incompatible versions

Thanks for the pointer, I should have seen that asmsiggraph was the example used to illustrate the subject, and noticed that I had retrieved the 0.93 version, so that really I should have rather created a acmsiggraph-0.93.layout file, and in master rather than in stable.

Happily, ACM decided to shift to the sole acmart.cls class for all their publications as Jürgen pointed out (see also https://www.tug.org/tug2016/slides/veytsman.pdf), and made very recently all their old class files unavailable. So we rather should cencentrate on creating a layout for the acmart class rather than fighting with obsolete stuff like I did (it is stated that obsoleted LaTeX acm packages won't be usable to submit publications after Spring 2017).

--
Jean-Pierre





Reply via email to