Am 27.06.2019 um 09:03 schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>: > > Am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2019, 17:45:28 CEST schrieb Stephan Witt: >> Am 26.06.2019 um 14:08 schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>: >>> >>> Am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2019, 13:21:25 CEST schrieb Stephan Witt: >>>>> I’m not surprised at these explanation. >>>>> >>>>> The real world scenario would be to disable python 3.4 on my system >>>>> and test it with 2.7.15 - this works for me. >>>>> >>>>> But - if it’s clear LyX doesn’t work with python 3.4 why is it tried and >>>>> used? >>>>> Or is it this what you propose? Change the tested minimal python version >>>>> from 3.3.0 to 3.5.0? >>>>> Then I’ll cannot agree more. >>>> >>>> The attached patch works for me on Mac. >>>> >>>> Stephan >>>> >>> >>> The patch (and the original) omits to work with python2.7? >> >> AFAICS it refuses to work with python < 2.7 >> (But works with e.g. 1.9 :) ???) >> >>> I have not seen problems (cmake build allows 2.7 version) >>> >>> My versions are 2.7.12 and 3.5.2. >> >> For me it works with 2.7.15 >> >> Stephan >> >> > > But that means that our python-selection is not correct.
You're referring to my 1.9 note? I cannot think of a system with python < 2.0… It was a nit-picking joke perhaps. I cannot test it :) > We have to test for 2.7 and 3.5+ IMHO. The code accepts 2.7 IMO. And rejects 3.2.x ATM but accepts 3.3. The idea is to change the test for 3.3 and raise the limit to 3.5. Stephan
