On 2020-02-22, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sat, 22 Feb 2020 09:44:21 -0000 (UTC) > schrieb Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net>:
>> On 2020-02-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 04:44:07PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> Am Mon, 3 Feb 2020 10:42:06 -0500 >> >> schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: >> >> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 04:29:34PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: >> ... >> > I tested on an updated TL. Removing the custom class option dvips fixes >> > it. However, I'm not sure this is the right thing to do. In the inverted >> > tests, we have the following: >> > # Comment by Jürgen Spitzmüller >> > # The document requests the dvips graphics driver, >> > # and of course this fails with any other backend. >> > # >> > # The document compiles if one sets the graphics driver to "Automatic" >> > # and remove the dvips class option. But then, the output is not correct >> > # (rotation of foils does not work). >> > export/examples/(|fr/)Presentations/Foils_pdf[45]_systemF >> > The output does not seem to change with or without the option for pdf2 >> > format, but the above comment suggests it does for other formats. >> Could you please test export to Postscript or PDF (ps2pdf) and check the >> orientation of rotated pages in the output? > No visible differences. > 'diffpdf' finds some, but only some glyphs are there, see attached. If it is/looks right with "auto" now, then it should be save to change from "dvips" to "auto" and remove the clause and comment from "invertedTests". Günter -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel