Am Fri, 13 Jan 2023 15:09:21 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 06:16:48PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:28:55 -0500 > > schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 06:55:11AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Am Wed, 11 Jan 2023 01:12:40 +0100 > > > > schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier <dourou...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > Still > > > > > > Error: Bad value "content-type" for attribute "http-equiv" > > > > > > on element > > > > > > "meta". > > > > > > > > > > > > Should we ignore this error? > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think we should ignore it. It really seems to be > > > > > platform-dependent > > > > > (either due to LyX or the HTML validator). I really can't reproduce > > > > > locally, > > > > > even when running the test through CTest (log attached for > > > > > Intro.lyx). However, > > > > > when uploading my file to https://validator.nu/#file, I get the error > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suppose the call to validate is still commented out in your > > > > export.cmake? > > > > I have now enabled the call at 88087a3c, now that the test passes here > > > > too. > > > > Thanks for your work. > > > > > > Thanks to both of you on making progress on these tests. Still a lot of > > > tests fail for me. Is it OK to comment out the check_xhtml_validate() > > > line until the tests are passing for all of us? Otherwise it's hard for > > > me to figure out which failures are due to regressions. > > > > > > Scott > > > > Yes, valid point. My intention was to have it enabled so that Thibaut can > > see failed > > tests without thinking on enabling them first. > > I see. In this case maybe we can enable them on a separate branch until > things are figured out. > > > But the distribution should have them > > disabled, since the need for html5validator is not handled appropriately. > > I think we disable the tests by default anyway in the distributed release. > > > Anyway, you have the last word on it. > > Let's keep them enabled another week to see if you and Thibaut figure > out the failures, and if not then disable them in a week, say 21 January? > Is this compromise acceptable to you? > > Scott Yes, thanks. Kornel
pgp2WMcpQsFcn.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
