On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:42:52AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Well honor whoever you want, but I would say that a text with a 1000's of > lines and I don't know how much insets is a bit more complicated than > a single line math inset, don't you?
No. What is the problem with the concept of a list of paragraphs, each holding a list of rows, each with some characters or nested insets? The only problem I see is some implementation that makes things complicated. "Hand wired" paragraph lists etc. No need to feel offended I am not blaming anybody here, most of the stuff seems to be in from the very beginning. I see quite a few parallels between "math cells" and "paragraph rows" and "math inset" and "paragraph". > Anyway I already pointed out that "maybe" we can do without the owner_ > of an inset, but we have to rewrite just some code which right now IS > working. So you surely won't have 1.2.0 out in 2004 would you? I am not talking about 1.2. Andre' -- André Pönitz .............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
