On Tuesday 07 January 2003 08:26, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:23:10AM +0000, José Matos wrote: > > Oh, you mean that I should catch the exception and then exit. But what is > > the difference? > > The difference is that it does not look like a lyx2lyx ccrash. > > > That is something easy to do. > > Then please do it ;-)
Ok. I will do it. > > What error message do you propose? > > Something like "This .lyx file does not look like format 1.foo.bar"? > > In any case I think if reLyX produced the beast, lyx2lyx should try to > handle it. Maybe there is a way not to bail out completely but to just > issue a warning? The reLyX output is wrong. Test it this way: * use the cvs version * create a newfile with a simple table, n*2 should be enough * export this file as latex * import it with lyx 1.2.x and notice that it has only one row That means that the export code for latex has changed and relyx can't cope with it. I will try to see if I can fix relyx, since this is relyx's fault. > Andre' -- José Abílio
