On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.) 'word-left' > > > and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs. Some 'selection-on, word-left' > > > combo should have done as well... > >
It saves some typing in command sequences. > > But that how the events are coming (be it by shift-move in cua.bind or > > shift-move could e bound to 'com-seq selection on; word-left;' > > Regarding the mouse stuff, this is hardcoded anyway. > > Well, one could even keep the 'word-left-select' command as some kind of > alias for 'com-seq selection on; word-left;' and still reduce the number > of LFUNs... An alias is fine, or with an argument: word-left select /Christian -- Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
