John Levon wrote: > > 3.1. > > OK, then we need to make that the minimum Qt version we support, > finally.
Agreed. As long as we silently take care that LyX at least builds against Qt2/Win Free unless Qt4 is out. > Pity about Qt/Win Free or whatever it was but there's not much > we can do otherwise. I think we should try if LyX builds with Qt4 beta, then we have a real chance that Qt4/Win Free will work too. Jürgen
