On Friday, January 18, 2019 10:22:55 PM PST Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > Yes, you are right. I did not response to the mentioned message > because I did not understand the point. > Now, I cannot give you the previous lyx file, it is too long, too sensitive > and it has a lot of pictures that I cannot communicate. > I expect that the attached file will be more helpful. > It just crashes when I try to open the inlet > (before it was when I run the spellchecker). > > For me, all these crashes seem due to a memory leak. > > Best. > \> ===================================================================== ====== > Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com > ===================================================================== ====== > > > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 at 9:44 PM > > From: "Scott Kostyshak" <skost...@lyx.org> > > To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org > > Subject: Re: crash > > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 09:30:02PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Where are you with the crash report that I submitted in December? > > > Actually, I can also crash lyx by using trhe option "go to label" > > > when I click on a figure reference. > > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > In the furture can you please respond to the relevant email thread or if > > it is a trac ticket, please post on trac? We get lots of emails (and > > unfortunately, several mysterious crashes) and I personally have a > > horrible memory, so keeping things organized helps out a lot. > > > > I think I found the crash you're referring to. For anyone who is > > > > curious, see here: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=trinity-4267d203-5264-439d-8 > > 4e6-c54806590235-1541597713075%403c-app-mailcom-bs04> > > Also, it seems you might have missed a question asked by Jean-Marc in > > > > that email thread. The question was the following: > > Is it enough to obfuscate it with "buffer-anonymize"? > > > > The reason why this question is so important is that it would really > > help us to have a minimal example file. Without an example file, it is > > quite difficult to track down the problem since we can't reproduce it. > > If you're not sure what "buffer-anonymize" is, please let us know and we > > can give you instructions for how to use it. > > > > Thanks for following up on this important issue. Hopefully we can figure > > out the crash. > > > > Best, > > > > Scott
It doesn't crash on 2.3.0 debian linux. John
