On Sep 2, 2014, at 10:24, Michael Hall <mik3h...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 2, 2014, at 2:58 AM, Hendrik Schreiber <h...@tagtraum.com> wrote: > >> That's certainly also possible, but it also does not solve the issue >> completely. > > True. Another work around really. But your crash appeared to be on a nil > passed to CFRelease in the native method. As long as it wasn't a problem > until you got to that CFRelease, just not doing the CFRelease should avoid > the crash.
Yes, indeed. But logic in other placed would not necessarily work as intended. -hendrik
