On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:07 PM, "René J.V. Bertin" <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 04, 2014, at 20:51, Eric Gallager wrote: > > > Isn't 236.3_1 the broken one that failed to build? How did you manage to > get it installed in the first place? > > I had an exchange (on here or via the bug tracker) and had even prepared > my own patched portfile that version-locked to 136 on 10.6, but Jeremy > pushed a patch very quickly that allowed v. 236 to build (with a minor > version bump IIRC). I think there was even a binary build of it. > I didn't keep trace of what I did since the issue was resolved "upstream" > ... now I regret. > > Not that I have the slightest idea what we're missing out on, but newer > should be better, right? :) > > René > > Not necessarily, often times newer just means "newer" or "removed old stuff"...
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users