Thanks. Missed that when trying to search for open tickets.

-- 
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com





> On Mar 14, 2024, at 6:25 PM, Dave Allured - NOAA Affiliate 
> <dave.allu...@noaa.gov> wrote:
> 
> There are multiple tickets on M4.  There is a fix in the works.  Yours seems 
> like the same thing.  Please see PR 
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/22984 .
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:16 PM Larry Stone <lston...@stonejongleux.com> 
> wrote:
> This seems like an Xcode issue more than MacPorts but since MacPorts is why I 
> have Xcode and its command line tools installed, I’ll ask here.
> 
> I upgraded to Sonoma about three weeks ago. All went well including following 
> the MacPorts instructions for major MacOS upgrades. All was working fine. At 
> the time, Xcode and CLT was version 15.1 but both have been upgraded to 15.3 
> since then.
> 
> Today, for the first time since upgrading to Sonoma, I ran the MacPorts 
> update sequence starting with port selfudpate. One of the packages needing 
> updating was Postfix which requires local building. The upgrade script 
> errored and an error box popped up saying "the m4 command requires the 
> command line developer tools.” Uh, they’re installed. Thinking maybe 
> something had changed, I let it rerun the CLT installation but per System 
> Information, the version was the same. Tried to upgrade Postfix again and the 
> same thing.
> 
> Looking in the CLT directory, I saw usr/bin/gm4 but not m4. A search 
> suggested that gm4 is just m4 with a different name (maybe GNU m4) and to 
> link m4 to gm4. I did and Postfix upgraded OK.
> 
> So what happened? Built OK three weeks ago with CLT 15.1 but failed today 
> with CLT 15.3. Was m4 in 15.1 but is now missing? (Normally, I’d just go to 
> the Time Machine disk to take a look but I had to reinitialize it just a few 
> days ago due to an error trying to expand the Time Machine partition on the 
> disk). Am I OK linking m4 to gm4?
> 
> -- 
> Larry Stone
> lston...@stonejongleux.com
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to