On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:02 AM, David Talmage <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree that static linking would make this simple. However, I'm targeting > devices with limited memory (e.g. N900, N8, N9). Dynamic linking is better in > this context. Applications probably want to (need to!) ship their own copy of the library anyway, which eliminates memory savings. Your library would need to be huge, or very popular, for this to matter. I'd encourage you to just link statically and call it a day. _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
