On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:58:01 +0200 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 1:36 PM -0400 2004-09-12, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> Mailman supports three levels of personalisation: OFF, ON, and FULL. >> They choose FULL, which in turn created the behaviors you report. ON >> may have been a better choice. > With this list, I think FULL was the correct choice. This is the only > way you can get the customized footers, etc... that give you direct > links to the appropriate URLs you can click on to manage your > subscriptions, etc.... While I haven't checked the implementation, given that the ON mode is doing per-recipient customisation there's no technical reason you couldn't do that in that mode. Which of course leads into" > My question is not which type of personalization is better. My > question is why does turning on full personalization result in this > behaviour? Uhhh....Barry? -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
