Bob Puff wrote: > That's the logical progression of that argument, and is the good reason > why obfuscation or even removal of parts is not only a good idea, its a > necessity. Exposing raw email addresses in their normal form is real > low-hanging fruit. > > Regardless of what I think, my clients will cry bloody murder if emails > leak out. I had one person recently google their email address, and > found a link to an archive file that should have been private. I had > removed all links to the archives, but somehow Google found it, indexed > it, and the guy threatened me with bloody murder if I didn't take it > down. Sheesh.
There's robots.txt, you know? If this is just about user outcry, then robots.txt will fix it (since all legitimate search engines honor it). -Julian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
