On Jun 29, 2010, at 10:49 PM, Malte S. Stretz wrote:

>I guess it shouldn't be too hard to whip up a patch for 3.0 as well.  I 
>just wanted to make sure (and start the old discussion again :) if it 
>should default to On or Off.  If I interpret this [2] post from 2006 it 
>isn't really needed.  (Hm, almost forgot:  I took some of the comments 
>from James Ralston's patch from 2006 and added it to mine.)

It may just be time to ditch the Sender rewriting in Mailman 3.  I don't think
a reading of RFC 5322 can justify it, and I'm pretty sure getting bounce
processing right with modern MTAs no longer requires it.

-Barry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

Reply via email to