On Sun, 13 May 2001 16:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
alex wetmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2001, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> There's reason to keep the RCPT TO envelope reasonably small to
>> prevent triggering some ISP's SPAM traps. Specifically, this
>> appears to be one of the filter points that AOL uses (and of
>> course it then drops the caught mail silently without a bounce of
>> warning).
> Do you have any details on AOL's spam filters? None of my AOL
> readers have complained about missing email. It looks like my
> largest list has 60 digested and 55 regular AOL members, so I'm
> guessing that their spam filter is set to a higher threshold than
> that.
They appear to be using a multi-valued metric for their spam
detection -- and to change their metrics regularly. See:
http://members.aol.com/adamkb/aol/mailfaq/dropped-mail.html#lists
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
The pressure to survive and rhetoric may make strange bedfellows
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users