On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:41:29AM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> 
> It turns out I was mistaken. I can't duplicate the problem. I only
> thought I could because the test list I was using had
> generic_nonmember_action set to Discard. When I set that to Hold, the
> mutt bounced message is held as expected.

Sorry folks, I finally tracked down a mis-configuration on my side.

A spam filter rule contained the (hungry) regexp

  X-Spam-Status:.*YES

instead of the more reasonable

  X-Spam-Status: YES

The messages I tried to bounce had this header:

  X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE...

which (blame BAYES :-) matches the regexp, so the message got discarded.

Cri

-- 
GPG/PGP Key-Id 0x943A5F0E      -    http://www.linux.it/~cri/cri.asc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

Reply via email to