Hello, Yes, I meant 2.1.5 -- thank you.
This is the additional information: >>> <mail...@list.informs.org> 5/7/2012 9:58 AM >>> This is a Mailman mailing list bounce action notice: List: Listname Member: email address Action: Subscription disabled. Reason: Excessive or fatal bounces. The triggering bounce notice is attached below. Questions? Contact the Mailman site administrator at mail...@list.informs.org. Received: from [64.56.46.224] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q47Dm58n027853; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:50:13 -0400 X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org q47Dm58n027853 Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org sender=transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org; sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.2.1 mail.informs.org q47Dm58n027853 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=informs.org; s=iol-mail; t=1336398721; bh=nBoB7gLpyON0aTfYk/86AG+8qdc=; h=Authentication-Results:Authentication-Results:From:To:Date: Message-ID:Accept-Language:acceptlanguage:Subject:Sender; b=DDR/BS 5R1Rg1ZFSefHd9sxFAzBL//DzEFLlSzj8ugS0fU0YaIJBnBo9/0tKK8eAKthApq60EL NAV4j5wAFhn+5wnJcTRvqfRCsGH4i0ZGjFK3E4cFNFQeylcGs3po6mK4o7ChJn+L9Rq UqaqYnbP8XM+y7nNLIv53AphKDs0QVU= Received: from mail.informs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q47C8hZH014190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:43 -0400 X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org q47C8hZH014190 Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org from=elis...@umd.edu; sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral Received: (from root@localhost) by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id q47C8hP3014187; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:43 -0400 Received: from sdc-mx1.umd.edu (sdc-mx1.umd.edu [128.8.162.150]) by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q47C8f8l014174; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:41 -0400 X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org q47C8f8l014174 Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org from=elis...@umd.edu; sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArsCAKC6p0+ACAzogWdsb2JhbABEgkanDwGDEYZTAQEWJieCEAMFIAgBXQElAQEBCgoUBRAP DCYBBAERAQgGDId0C7EkiQmQPGMEkBoBiS2PfQ Received: from oitpmxht01.umd.edu (HELO exch.mail.umd.edu) ([128.8.12.232]) by sdc-mx1.umd.edu with ESMTP; 07 May 2012 08:08:40 -0400 Received: from oitmxcms01vi.AD.UMD.EDU ([169.254.1.122]) by OITPMXHT01.AD.UMD.EDU ([128.8.12.232]) with mapi; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:40 -0400 From: Elise Miller-Hooks <elis...@umd.edu> To: "transci-logistics-sect...@list.informs.org" <transci-logistics-sect...@list.informs.org>, "transci-logistics-soci...@list.informs.org" <transci-logistics-soci...@list.informs.org> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:37 -0400 Thread-Topic: A great loss for the TSL Society Thread-Index: Ac0sSaLy16gsDbusR+ShPb1Nsm9MIA== Message-ID: <0d78e3bee1f5c04ca3641f214ee381ad01a4eba48...@oitmxcms01vi.ad.umd.edu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=2.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.informs.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 May 2012 09:48:04 -0400 Cc: Subject: [Transci-logistics-society] A great loss for the TSL Society X-BeenThere: transci-logistics-soci...@list.informs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Transportation Science and Logistics Society of INFORMS <transci-logistics-society.list.informs.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://list.informs.org/mailman/listinfo/transci-logistics-society>, <mailto:transci-logistics-society-requ...@list.informs.org?subject=unsub scribe> List-Archive: <http://list.informs.org/pipermail/transci-logistics-society> List-Post: <mailto:transci-logistics-soci...@list.informs.org> List-Help: <mailto:transci-logistics-society-requ...@list.informs.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://list.informs.org/mailman/listinfo/transci-logistics-society>, <mailto:transci-logistics-society-requ...@list.informs.org?subject=subsc ribe> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1216496403==" Sender: transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org Errors-To: transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org Return-path: <> Received: from mail.informs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q47ER99A006791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org.procmail>; Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:10 -0400 X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org q47ER99A006791 Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org from=mailer-dae...@mail.informs.org; sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.2.1 mail.informs.org q47ER99A006791 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=informs.org; s=iol-mail; t=1336400836; bh=r/uqa39i9pKtHAwopuBeggH2Cus=; h=Date:From: Message-Id:To:Subject:Auto-Submitted; b=rwpTPxmFKIgMnHAesV2Zf6JDRH BdYIdKlntNcVfBWoTCzbsdoC9xR0fQ1oIehAPHZKF8NBIaVR2ENgw+LxqIRlDSv6VLi NvjEkjUFOt9vOjH1aoXj3Bz8h238kx8JeOaOaH6QW9EaqqsVis0cLq9YwVD01EwoeCy FS9CNF2l9xU= Received: (from root@localhost) by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id q47ER9dQ006788 for transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org.procmail; Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost) by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) id q47ER58i028269; Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:05 -0400 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-dae...@mail.informs.org> Message-Id: <201205071427.q47er58i028...@mail.informs.org> To: <transci-logistics-society-boun...@list.informs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="q47ER58i028269.1336400825/mail.informs.org" Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.informs.org Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.informs.org Received-From-MTA: DNS; localhost Arrival-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:50:13 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; kenneth.k...@canterbury.ac.nz Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.canterbury.ac.nz Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal user:kenneth.k...@canterbury.ac.nz Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:53:26 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; martin.savelsbe...@csiro.au Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; act-mx.csiro.au Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:54:06 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; dlag...@deis.unica.it Action: failed Status: 5.1.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; deis.unica.it Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Host unknown Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:54:24 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; muhammad.mazahi...@etudiants.ensam.eu Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: DNS; mail-in.ensam.eu Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 511 Destinataire inconnu - Recipient unknown -(muhammad.mazahi...@etudiants.ensam.eu) Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:57:39 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; kroodber...@fac.fbk.eur.nl Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; mercury.fbk.eur.nl Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1 <kroodber...@fac.fbk.eur.nl>: Recipient addressrejected: User unknown Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:57:43 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; dad...@fhwr-berlin.de Action: failed Status: 5.1.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; fhwr-berlin.de Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Host unknown Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:57:58 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; a.stra...@lancaster.ac.uk Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; whobblebury.lancs.ac.uk Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Invalid recipient address Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:04:41 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; eduardo.soa...@latop.com.br Action: failed Status: 5.7.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; mx5.infolink.com.br Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.7.1<64-56-46-224.isp.comcastbusiness.net[64.56.46.224]>: Clienthost rejected: =myspam gold= We don't accept Direct Deliveryfrom Dial-up/DSL/CABLE/Wireless/3G networks. If you are NOTdoing E-mail Marketing/Opt-in/Opt-out/SPAM/UCE (which areforbidden here), please contact ab...@infolink.com.br with thecomplete ERROR MESSAGE to be analized. Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:04:46 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; b...@man.dtu.dk Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; filter2.ait.dtu.dk Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1 <b...@man.dtu.dk>... Sorry, no mailbox here by thatname or mailbox is over quota Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:06:30 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; ra...@man.dtu.dk Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; filter2.ait.dtu.dk Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1 <ra...@man.dtu.dk>... Sorry, no mailbox here bythat name or mailbox is over quota Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:06:30 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; liebc...@math.tu-berlin.de Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; mail.tu-berlin.de Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Recipient verify failed Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:06:56 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; k.akartun...@ms.unimelb.edu.au Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; puffer.ms.unimelb.edu.au Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 <k.akartun...@ms.unimelb.edu.au>: Recipient addressrejected: User unknown in local recipient table Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:10:15 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; comb...@ornl.gov Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; mta02.ornl.gov Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:15:07 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; jlancas...@qatarairways.com.qa Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.qatarairways.com.qa Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:15:50 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; schin...@transmartconsulting.gr Action: failed Status: 5.1.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; transmartconsulting.gr Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Host unknown Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:19:19 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; kwanghun.ch...@uclouvain.be Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; smtp.sgsi.ucl.ac.be Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1 <kwanghun.ch...@uclouvain.be>: Recipient addressrejected: unknown address Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:21:47 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; seher...@uniandes.edu.co Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; avmx02.uniandes.edu.co Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 Recipient address rejected: User unknown Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:24:44 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; js...@ust.hk Action: failed Status: 5.3.0 Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.ust.hk Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 553 5.3.0 <js...@ust.hk>... Recipient address no longerexists Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:25:27 -0400 The original message was received at Mon, 7 May 2012 09:50:13 -0400 from localhost [127.0.0.1] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <kenneth.k...@canterbury.ac.nz> (reason: 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal user: kenneth.k...@canterbury.ac.nz) <martin.savelsbe...@csiro.au> (reason: 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.) <dlag...@deis.unica.it> (reason: 550 Host unknown) <muhammad.mazahi...@etudiants.ensam.eu> (reason: 511 Destinataire inconnu - Recipient unknown - (muhammad.mazahi...@etudiants.ensam.eu)) <kroodber...@fac.fbk.eur.nl> (reason: 550 5.1.1 <kroodber...@fac.fbk.eur.nl>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown) <dad...@fhwr-berlin.de> (reason: 550 Host unknown) -----Original Message----- From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 7:25 PM To: Futchko, Rose Cc: mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Help with Bounce Processing On 5/7/2012 2:17 PM, Futchko, Rose wrote: > We are using Mailman 2.15 and have an unusual problem that I was > hoping that someone can help me with. There is no 2.15. Do you mean 2.1.5? > We have close to 109 lists running > successfully, however there are times when bounce processing sends the > following message (over 100 times) in the span of a few hours to one > user/subscriber to the list. They are not the admin: > > > > This is a Mailman mailing list bounce action notice: Without seeing the complete message with all headers, it is virtually impossible to guess what may be happening. Can you post a complete message example with all headers? -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org