Allan Hansen writes: > [ABH] The “From:” should contain the author address, but if we want to > keep our Yahoo/AOL subscribers…
Exactly. This is what we economists call the Theorem of the Second Best: When it's already broken, sometimes the best you can do is to break it harder. > [ABH] That’s not a bad idea, Stephen. I could try that. And yes, we are very > protective of our lists, so “Reply-To:” is the author address. > When I get Mailman 3 set up, I’ll put in an ‘oopsie’ address with > an auto-responder. I’ll assume that Mailman 3 will be able to detect > auto-responder infinite loops. :-) Without change to the Mailman code (Mailman 2 or Mailman 3), the "oopsie" address will have to be handled by a separate autoresponder. Mailman only knows about the standard addresses, and it doesn't allow configuration of autoresponder features beyond "on" and "off". > I’m a bit red in the face that I did not think of that, but what > are friends for! "Mail is hard, and then you retire." From "The Sysadmin's Lament". :-) Steve ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
