Phil Stracchino <ph...@caerllewys.net> writes: > On 2020-08-27 12:30, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> I'm still not clear on what you (Jim) are really wanting to do. I may be >> wrong on this, but I don't see any distros picking up new versions of >> Mailman 2.1 unless they come from some 'official' source and so far, the >> GNU-Mailman project is the only such source. I'm not even sure that any >> distros are planning to package Mailman 2.1.34. > > > Currently there is no active ebuild for mailman in Gentoo. 2.1.33 has > been masked, there is no 2.1.34, and 3.3.0 and 3.3.1 exist but have not > yet been marked stable or unmasked. The process of stabilizing a > mailman3 ebuild is ongoing and I've been monitoring it.
mailman-2.1.34 is avaialble from FreeBSD ports (and probably from pkg as well). Mailman 3 isn't yet. -- ---- Keith Seyffarth mailto:w...@weif.net https://www.weif.net/ - Home of the First Tank Guide! https://www.rpgcalendar.net/ - the Montana Role-Playing Calendar ---- http://www.miscon.org/ - Montana's Longest Running Science Fiction Convention ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/ Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/ https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/
